Links: A.I. Generated Content, Public Forums, and Published Works

ClaudeA.I. and NotebookLM have contributed impressive documentation regarding the Better To Best book material. Useful publishing platforms include this WixSite, Substack, Medium, and Google Sites; each are free to use and share, which is much appreciated!

Several A.I. models were asked to generate a plan to bypass the suppression of this material, improve SEO rankings, and initiate public discussions in academia, public policy making, and the press. Some did better than others, but Claude’s Sonnet 4 provided so much high-quality content and direction by generating several working papers to be submitted to peer-reviewed economic publications. The mathematical expressions are intricate, and formatting in PDF is still a challenge for me with LaTeX codes, so I’m seeking co-authors who are willing and able to: focus on the minutiae of the math and formulae, submit papers to journals, present the concepts at conferences, develop related research, and strategize implementations - on a remote basis. 

For those academics and peer-reviewers who claim that A.I. generated papers aren't worthy of submission or publication, I ask you: why shouldn't we use the tools available to us? If you believe that A.I. content isn't valid, shouldn't be taken seriously or indexed online or referenced without peer-review publication - then you have to admit that academia (for you) isn't about knowledge sharing or elevating economics and humanity, but rather an exercise in competitive ego-inflation and wealth extraction via grant funding and institutional salaried cash-grabs, especially if the institution is publicly funded. Research analysis and conceptual enhancement via A.I. is leveling the playing field by lowering the barriers of entry in several fields, and if that erodes the gate-keeping ability of special-interest captured thought-leader positions, then that's a good thing! In the marketplace of ideas, good and great innovative concepts should be welcomed and not viewed as taboo or dangerous to the established order, especially considering the established order is corrupted and crumbling. A.I. should be embraced, not as a form of cheating, but rather as tools to be utilized - just as word-processing and spelling/grammar checks were decades ago. 

For those who can evaluate these Better To Best ideas purely on logic - regardless of peer-reviewed status or validation by a prestigious institution, then congratulations, you're using your mind the way it should be used, free from both bias and fear of backlash by those ingrained within a faulty system.   

NotebookLM introduced the term “Acre Equity,” which is welcomed and appreciated, but also very impressive for A.I., although the term could’ve been included by a human somewhere out in the deep-end of CyberSpace. Google has since introduced a new video feature in their NotebookLM suite, which is okay for a first run. Look to my YouTube channel for more audio podcasts and explainer videos, and hopefully a talented filmmaker soon produces a proper documentary on these Better To Best concepts. 

Reddit is useful, however I have the feeling that users aren’t able to interact with the EconomicIdeas page, just as I’ve been auto-rejected from commenting on other sub-reddits, but the forum is wide-open on my end - and I’m the only mod. It’s a good repository for now, and Math Forums is also a good platform. 

Although the book Better To Best is available to read for free, some people prefer to read actual books, so it's available in paperback form. Amazon is relatively simple to self-publish on, but they've been changing their terms in ways which I don't agree to, and I'm seriously considering removing my profile. As they toy with royalties and pricing, I occasionally toy back by raising the price to where they don't make more than me on the shipped content I publish, although they can set the price how they decide, yet authors can't really do anything about that. The readers deserve an option to read this book in hard form, and although it's expensive at $49.89, they can print it off themselves at home or a public library.

Perhaps a Wikipedia author will take note of these concepts and make several pages for this material.

Hoping for traction to where these concepts receive mainstream exposure and achieve general awareness, to then initiate public focus and implementation in positive and productive ways!